Tuesday, 15 July 2014

Review: Glengarry Glen Ross

Thursday, 10 July, 2014
Review by SAMSARA DUNSTON

REVIEW: GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS

The atmosphere of the audience as they entered the theatre for this preview was one of restrained anticipation.  Glengarry Glen Ross is considered to be David Mamet’s greatest play.  There was a sense of excitement to see how the Melbourne Theatre Company would present it in their sumptuous Sumner Theatre.

Just before the curtain went up Alkinos Tsilimidos (director) announced that the actor originally cast as Shelly Levene had fallen ill and needed to be replaced four days ago.  A tangible murmur of dismay rippled through the auditorium as the scope of this tragedy was realised, with Levene being the main protagonist.  We were advised that John McTernan was now playing the role, but would be performing with script in hand.  The compassion and support from the audience was demonstrated by the voluminous applause as the curtain rose and McTernan stood there alone with his script in acknowledgement of the situation.  Everyone was in the mood to enjoy the production and support their valiant efforts.  Unfortunately this was not rewarded.

Glengarry Glen Ross is a study in workplace bullying, the ramifications of intense competition, and desperation.  Levene (McTernan)is an aging real estate salesman who is being ‘outsold’ by the very men he trained.  A sales competition has been set up to reward the best and sack the worst.  This sets the scene for backstabbing, bribery, and a dog eat dog world where survival of the fittest is the name of the game and there are no rules.
Mamet crafts the play with a mastery which is breathtaking.  Each scene builds on the one before, and there is no respite to the tension until the explosion of the denouement.  Unfortunately Tsilimidos’s production does not achieve this tension. 

Tsilimidos has a background in film direction.  He has emerged as a theatre director through the MTC with the previous productions Red and The Mountaintop. The Moutaintop and Glengarry Glen Ross suffer from the same flaws, although the intimacy of the Fairfax Studio allowed the audience to overlook them in the former production.  Tsilimidos seems to prefer symmetry in design, and uses the stage as a frame rather than an interactive space for the performers.  Whilst the set was lush and detailed as we have come to expect from designer Shaun Gurton, the neatness worked against the chaos Mamet creates as worlds fall apart.  Nigel Levings (lighting designer) makes a brave attempt to enliven the space, but again, this just becomes framing.

Alex Dimitriades (Roma) and Brett Cousins (Lingk) provide the only source of life in this sea of dullness.  The rest of the cast lack definition and often seem to not really know why they are there.  I will say that McTernan delivered his lines with great passion and understanding, and if he can achieve this in only four days, it bodes well for the rest of the season.


Glengarry Glen Ross by David Mamet Directed by Alkinos Tsilimidos, set by Shaun Gurton, costumes by Jill Johanson, lighting by Nigel Levings, sound and composition by Tristan Meredith.  With Rodney Afif, Nick Barkla, Justin Stewart Cotta, Brett Cousins, Alex Dimitriades, and John McTernan.  Melbourne Theatre Company, Sumner Theatre, until 9 August.

Sunday, 6 July 2014

Sunday, Busy Sunday

A very full and busy day today.  It began with a meet up this afternoon with the Women Who Write group.  It was my first meet up with this group, but it was fun, and the organiser, Lee, was really friendly and spoke with each of us.  I met a couple of great women, and they got me thinking about the concept of publishing, and how to give the work a life.  I am the only playwright in the group, and it was really interesting to see how high the concept of publishing was on Everyone's agenda.  It makes sense of course, because how else do you earn a living.  I just always think in terms of a piece going into performance so it is refreshing to think about it as a piece of writing rather than performance.  Two women talked about their experiences self publishing and one broke down the economics.  It was really fun and informative.

The next item on the agenda today was the company meeting with WIT.  It was nice to meet everyone and they certainly appear to have a professional approach to what they are doing.  I am a bit concerned that the aspirations are higher than my experience tells me is achievable, but I don't know what connections people have and the economics of fundraising may be higher given the size of the ensemble.  I shall wait and see and go along with things and just see what happens.  Belinda has asked me to help her with some direction for her play 'The Bookworm' which is being performed as part of Fringe.  Her confidence is heartening.  I also put forward a suggestion for a midyear season of Sarah Daniels play Masterpiece.  Now I just have to find it!

All in all, a very productive and inspiring Sunday:)

Friday, 4 July 2014

The Nuclear Solution

This evening I went to a physics lecture.  What the Fuck????  No, I haven't gone crazy and yes I had an ulterior motive.  The lecture was about physics, entropy and climate change.  I actually wanted to understand more about entropy so I could flesh out my short play 'Entropia'.  I don't know if I really achieved much real increase of knowledge, but the lecturer was entertaining and gave me some fun analogies I might be able to incorporate into the script.

I guess what I really took away from the lecture was a real understanding of the greenhouse problem and also a bit of a realistic take on what we can do about it.  The lecturer was very pragmatic and wasn't proposing radically changing how we as human beings function in our world.  He was basically saying that the only way we can get to our necessary CO2 targets by the required dates without reverting to the stone age was to get rid of coal and gas energy sources.  What I really liked was that he also had a pragmatic solution.  He pointed out that we can't possibly achieve it striving for renewable energy resources, and that the only real and achievable alternative was nuclear power.

This makes sense to me.  I can't see any of us willingly changing the lifestyle we have developed and yet we do seem to agree that we need to do SOMETHING.  Is it perfect?  No.  Is it achievable?  Yes.  Does the good outweigh the bad?  Yes.

Regarding entropy - there seems to be some confusion as to whether it is the second or third law of thermodynamics.  More research required.